clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -9,15 +9,15 @@ struct fsyscall_gtod_data_t {
|
||||
seqcount_t seq;
|
||||
struct timespec wall_time;
|
||||
struct timespec monotonic_time;
|
||||
cycle_t clk_mask;
|
||||
u64 clk_mask;
|
||||
u32 clk_mult;
|
||||
u32 clk_shift;
|
||||
void *clk_fsys_mmio;
|
||||
cycle_t clk_cycle_last;
|
||||
u64 clk_cycle_last;
|
||||
} ____cacheline_aligned;
|
||||
|
||||
struct itc_jitter_data_t {
|
||||
int itc_jitter;
|
||||
cycle_t itc_lastcycle;
|
||||
u64 itc_lastcycle;
|
||||
} ____cacheline_aligned;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user