clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View File

@@ -9,15 +9,15 @@ struct fsyscall_gtod_data_t {
seqcount_t seq;
struct timespec wall_time;
struct timespec monotonic_time;
cycle_t clk_mask;
u64 clk_mask;
u32 clk_mult;
u32 clk_shift;
void *clk_fsys_mmio;
cycle_t clk_cycle_last;
u64 clk_cycle_last;
} ____cacheline_aligned;
struct itc_jitter_data_t {
int itc_jitter;
cycle_t itc_lastcycle;
u64 itc_lastcycle;
} ____cacheline_aligned;