clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View File

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
#if defined(CONFIG_CYCLES_CLOCKSOURCE)
static notrace cycle_t bfin_read_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
static notrace u64 bfin_read_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
return __bfin_cycles_off + (get_cycles() << __bfin_cycles_mod);
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void __init setup_gptimer0(void)
enable_gptimers(TIMER0bit);
}
static cycle_t bfin_read_gptimer0(struct clocksource *cs)
static u64 bfin_read_gptimer0(struct clocksource *cs)
{
return bfin_read_TIMER0_COUNTER();
}