clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_CYCLES_CLOCKSOURCE)
|
||||
|
||||
static notrace cycle_t bfin_read_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
|
||||
static notrace u64 bfin_read_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
|
||||
return __bfin_cycles_off + (get_cycles() << __bfin_cycles_mod);
|
||||
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void __init setup_gptimer0(void)
|
||||
enable_gptimers(TIMER0bit);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static cycle_t bfin_read_gptimer0(struct clocksource *cs)
|
||||
static u64 bfin_read_gptimer0(struct clocksource *cs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return bfin_read_TIMER0_COUNTER();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user