clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Este commit está contenido en:
@@ -59,13 +59,13 @@ static u64 notrace ep93xx_read_sched_clock(void)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cycle_t ep93xx_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *c)
|
||||
u64 ep93xx_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *c)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u64 ret;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = readl(EP93XX_TIMER4_VALUE_LOW);
|
||||
ret |= ((u64) (readl(EP93XX_TIMER4_VALUE_HIGH) & 0xff) << 32);
|
||||
return (cycle_t) ret;
|
||||
return (u64) ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int ep93xx_clkevt_set_next_event(unsigned long next,
|
||||
|
Referencia en una nueva incidencia
Block a user