clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Este commit está contenido en:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
padre 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
Se han modificado 132 ficheros con 320 adiciones y 327 borrados

Ver fichero

@@ -59,13 +59,13 @@ static u64 notrace ep93xx_read_sched_clock(void)
return ret;
}
cycle_t ep93xx_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *c)
u64 ep93xx_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *c)
{
u64 ret;
ret = readl(EP93XX_TIMER4_VALUE_LOW);
ret |= ((u64) (readl(EP93XX_TIMER4_VALUE_HIGH) & 0xff) << 32);
return (cycle_t) ret;
return (u64) ret;
}
static int ep93xx_clkevt_set_next_event(unsigned long next,