seccomp,x86,arm,mips,s390: Remove nr parameter from secure_computing
The secure_computing function took a syscall number parameter, but it only paid any attention to that parameter if seccomp mode 1 was enabled. Rather than coming up with a kludge to get the parameter to work in mode 2, just remove the parameter. To avoid churn in arches that don't have seccomp filters (and may not even support syscall_get_nr right now), this leaves the parameter in secure_computing_strict, which is now a real function. For ARM, this is a bit ugly due to the fact that ARM conditionally supports seccomp filters. Fixing that would probably only be a couple of lines of code, but it should be coordinated with the audit maintainers. This will be a slight slowdown on some arches. The right fix is to pass in all of seccomp_data instead of trying to make just the syscall nr part be fast. This is a prerequisite for making two-phase seccomp work cleanly. Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Kees Cook

parent
70c8038dd6
commit
a4412fc948
@@ -23,8 +23,11 @@
|
||||
|
||||
/* #define SECCOMP_DEBUG 1 */
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
|
||||
#include <asm/syscall.h>
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
|
||||
#include <linux/filter.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/pid.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
|
||||
@@ -172,7 +175,7 @@ static int seccomp_check_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns valid seccomp BPF response codes.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static u32 seccomp_run_filters(int syscall)
|
||||
static u32 seccomp_run_filters(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct seccomp_filter *f = ACCESS_ONCE(current->seccomp.filter);
|
||||
struct seccomp_data sd;
|
||||
@@ -564,10 +567,43 @@ static int mode1_syscalls_32[] = {
|
||||
};
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
int __secure_computing(int this_syscall)
|
||||
static void __secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int *syscall_whitelist = mode1_syscalls;
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
|
||||
if (is_compat_task())
|
||||
syscall_whitelist = mode1_syscalls_32;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
do {
|
||||
if (*syscall_whitelist == this_syscall)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
} while (*++syscall_whitelist);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef SECCOMP_DEBUG
|
||||
dump_stack();
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
audit_seccomp(this_syscall, SIGKILL, SECCOMP_RET_KILL);
|
||||
do_exit(SIGKILL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
|
||||
void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int mode = current->seccomp.mode;
|
||||
|
||||
if (mode == 0)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
else if (mode == SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT)
|
||||
__secure_computing_strict(this_syscall);
|
||||
else
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
int __secure_computing(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
|
||||
int this_syscall = syscall_get_nr(current, regs);
|
||||
int exit_sig = 0;
|
||||
int *syscall;
|
||||
u32 ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@@ -578,23 +614,12 @@ int __secure_computing(int this_syscall)
|
||||
|
||||
switch (current->seccomp.mode) {
|
||||
case SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT:
|
||||
syscall = mode1_syscalls;
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
|
||||
if (is_compat_task())
|
||||
syscall = mode1_syscalls_32;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
do {
|
||||
if (*syscall == this_syscall)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
} while (*++syscall);
|
||||
exit_sig = SIGKILL;
|
||||
ret = SECCOMP_RET_KILL;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
__secure_computing_strict(this_syscall);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
|
||||
case SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER: {
|
||||
int data;
|
||||
struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
|
||||
ret = seccomp_run_filters(this_syscall);
|
||||
ret = seccomp_run_filters();
|
||||
data = ret & SECCOMP_RET_DATA;
|
||||
ret &= SECCOMP_RET_ACTION;
|
||||
switch (ret) {
|
||||
@@ -652,9 +677,10 @@ int __secure_computing(int this_syscall)
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
|
||||
skip:
|
||||
audit_seccomp(this_syscall, exit_sig, ret);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER */
|
||||
|
||||
long prctl_get_seccomp(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user