KVM: s390: Improve is_valid_psw()
As a program status word is also invalid (and thus generates an specification exception) if the instruction address is not even, we should test this in is_valid_psw(), too. This patch also exports the function so that it becomes available for other parts of the S390 KVM code as well. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Christian Borntraeger

parent
3a801517ad
commit
a3fb577e48
@@ -365,7 +365,8 @@ static void handle_new_psw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
||||
#define PSW_ADDR_24 0x0000000000ffffffUL
|
||||
#define PSW_ADDR_31 0x000000007fffffffUL
|
||||
|
||||
static int is_valid_psw(psw_t *psw) {
|
||||
int is_valid_psw(psw_t *psw)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (psw->mask & PSW_MASK_UNASSIGNED)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if ((psw->mask & PSW_MASK_ADDR_MODE) == PSW_MASK_BA) {
|
||||
@@ -376,6 +377,8 @@ static int is_valid_psw(psw_t *psw) {
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if ((psw->mask & PSW_MASK_ADDR_MODE) == PSW_MASK_EA)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (psw->addr & 1)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user