Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs
Pull fourth vfs update from Al Viro: "d_inode() annotations from David Howells (sat in for-next since before the beginning of merge window) + four assorted fixes" * 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: RCU pathwalk breakage when running into a symlink overmounting something fix I_DIO_WAKEUP definition direct-io: only inc/dec inode->i_dio_count for file systems fs/9p: fix readdir() VFS: assorted d_backing_inode() annotations VFS: fs/inode.c helpers: d_inode() annotations VFS: fs/cachefiles: d_backing_inode() annotations VFS: fs library helpers: d_inode() annotations VFS: assorted weird filesystems: d_inode() annotations VFS: normal filesystems (and lustre): d_inode() annotations VFS: security/: d_inode() annotations VFS: security/: d_backing_inode() annotations VFS: net/: d_inode() annotations VFS: net/unix: d_backing_inode() annotations VFS: kernel/: d_inode() annotations VFS: audit: d_backing_inode() annotations VFS: Fix up some ->d_inode accesses in the chelsio driver VFS: Cachefiles should perform fs modifications on the top layer only VFS: AF_UNIX sockets should call mknod on the top layer only
Esse commit está contido em:
@@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ static int do_setattr(struct ubifs_info *c, struct inode *inode,
|
||||
int ubifs_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
|
||||
struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
|
||||
struct ubifs_info *c = inode->i_sb->s_fs_info;
|
||||
|
||||
dbg_gen("ino %lu, mode %#x, ia_valid %#x",
|
||||
@@ -1302,7 +1302,7 @@ static void ubifs_invalidatepage(struct page *page, unsigned int offset,
|
||||
|
||||
static void *ubifs_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct ubifs_inode *ui = ubifs_inode(dentry->d_inode);
|
||||
struct ubifs_inode *ui = ubifs_inode(d_inode(dentry));
|
||||
|
||||
nd_set_link(nd, ui->data);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
Referência em uma nova issue
Block a user