e1000e: cleanup - check return values consistently

The majority of the e1000e code checks most function return values using a
test like 'if (ret_val)' or 'if (!ret_val)' but there are a few instances
of 'if (ret_val == 0)'.  This patch converts the latter to the former for
consistency.

Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Bruce Allan
2012-01-31 06:37:27 +00:00
committed by Jeff Kirsher
parent f36bb6cacd
commit 9e2d7657e2
2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static int e1000_set_eeprom(struct net_device *netdev,
ret_val = e1000_read_nvm(hw, first_word, 1, &eeprom_buff[0]);
ptr++;
}
if (((eeprom->offset + eeprom->len) & 1) && (ret_val == 0))
if (((eeprom->offset + eeprom->len) & 1) && (!ret_val))
/* need read/modify/write of last changed EEPROM word */
/* only the first byte of the word is being modified */
ret_val = e1000_read_nvm(hw, last_word, 1,