drm/i915: Introduce the i915_user_extension_method
An idea for extending uABI inspired by Vulkan's extension chains. Instead of expanding the data struct for each ioctl every time we need to add a new feature, define an extension chain instead. As we add optional interfaces to control the ioctl, we define a new extension struct that can be linked into the ioctl data only when required by the user. The key advantage being able to ignore large control structs for optional interfaces/extensions, while being able to process them in a consistent manner. In comparison to other extensible ioctls, the key difference is the use of a linked chain of extension structs vs an array of tagged pointers. For example, struct drm_amdgpu_cs_chunk { __u32 chunk_id; __u32 length_dw; __u64 chunk_data; }; struct drm_amdgpu_cs_in { __u32 ctx_id; __u32 bo_list_handle; __u32 num_chunks; __u32 _pad; __u64 chunks; }; allows userspace to pass in array of pointers to extension structs, but must therefore keep constructing that array along side the command stream. In dynamic situations like that, a linked list is preferred and does not similar from extra cache line misses as the extension structs themselves must still be loaded separate to the chunks array. v2: Apply the tail call optimisation directly to nip the worry of stack overflow in the bud. v3: Defend against recursion. v4: Fixup local types to match new uabi Opens: - do we include the result as an out-field in each chain? struct i915_user_extension { __u64 next_extension; __u64 name; __s32 result; __u32 mbz; /* reserved for future use */ }; * Undecided, so provision some room for future expansion. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190322092325.5883-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
@@ -105,6 +105,37 @@
|
||||
__T; \
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* container_of_user: Extract the superclass from a pointer to a member.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Exactly like container_of() with the exception that it plays nicely
|
||||
* with sparse for __user @ptr.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define container_of_user(ptr, type, member) ({ \
|
||||
void __user *__mptr = (void __user *)(ptr); \
|
||||
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__same_type(*(ptr), ((type *)0)->member) && \
|
||||
!__same_type(*(ptr), void), \
|
||||
"pointer type mismatch in container_of()"); \
|
||||
((type __user *)(__mptr - offsetof(type, member))); })
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* check_user_mbz: Check that a user value exists and is zero
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Frequently in our uABI we reserve space for future extensions, and
|
||||
* two ensure that userspace is prepared we enforce that space must
|
||||
* be zero. (Then any future extension can safely assume a default value
|
||||
* of 0.)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* check_user_mbz() combines checking that the user pointer is accessible
|
||||
* and that the contained value is zero.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns: -EFAULT if not accessible, -EINVAL if !zero, or 0 on success.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define check_user_mbz(U) ({ \
|
||||
typeof(*(U)) mbz__; \
|
||||
get_user(mbz__, (U)) ? -EFAULT : mbz__ ? -EINVAL : 0; \
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
static inline u64 ptr_to_u64(const void *ptr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (uintptr_t)ptr;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user