locks: keep a count of locks on the flctx lists

This makes things a bit more efficient in the cifs and ceph lock
pushing code.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
这个提交包含在:
Jeff Layton
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
提交者 Jeff Layton
父节点 7448cc37b1
当前提交 9bd0f45b70
修改 4 个文件,包含 38 行新增35 行删除

查看文件

@@ -1125,7 +1125,7 @@ cifs_push_posix_locks(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile)
struct cifs_tcon *tcon = tlink_tcon(cfile->tlink);
struct file_lock *flock;
struct file_lock_context *flctx = inode->i_flctx;
unsigned int count = 0, i;
unsigned int i;
int rc = 0, xid, type;
struct list_head locks_to_send, *el;
struct lock_to_push *lck, *tmp;
@@ -1136,20 +1136,14 @@ cifs_push_posix_locks(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile)
if (!flctx)
goto out;
spin_lock(&flctx->flc_lock);
list_for_each(el, &flctx->flc_posix) {
count++;
}
spin_unlock(&flctx->flc_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&locks_to_send);
/*
* Allocating count locks is enough because no FL_POSIX locks can be
* added to the list while we are holding cinode->lock_sem that
* Allocating flc_posix_cnt locks is enough because no FL_POSIX locks
* can be added to the list while we are holding cinode->lock_sem that
* protects locking operations of this inode.
*/
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
for (i = 0; i < flctx->flc_posix_cnt; i++) {
lck = kmalloc(sizeof(struct lock_to_push), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!lck) {
rc = -ENOMEM;