ASoC: Rename soc_enum.max field with items

The name "max" in struct soc_enum is rather confusing since it
actually takes the number of items.  With "max", one might try to
assign (nitems - 1) value.

Rename the field to a more appropriate one, "items", which is also
used in struct snd_ctl_elem_info, too.

This patch also rewrites some code like "if (x > e->nitems - 1)" with
"if (x >= e->nitems)".  Not only the latter improves the readability,
it also fixes a potential bug when e->items is zero.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Takashi Iwai
2014-02-18 08:11:42 +01:00
committed by Mark Brown
parent 38dbfb59d1
commit 9a8d38db03
11 changed files with 47 additions and 47 deletions

View File

@@ -1861,7 +1861,7 @@ static void max98095_handle_eq_pdata(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
/* Now point the soc_enum to .texts array items */
max98095->eq_enum.texts = max98095->eq_texts;
max98095->eq_enum.max = max98095->eq_textcnt;
max98095->eq_enum.items = max98095->eq_textcnt;
ret = snd_soc_add_codec_controls(codec, controls, ARRAY_SIZE(controls));
if (ret != 0)
@@ -2016,7 +2016,7 @@ static void max98095_handle_bq_pdata(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
/* Now point the soc_enum to .texts array items */
max98095->bq_enum.texts = max98095->bq_texts;
max98095->bq_enum.max = max98095->bq_textcnt;
max98095->bq_enum.items = max98095->bq_textcnt;
ret = snd_soc_add_codec_controls(codec, controls, ARRAY_SIZE(controls));
if (ret != 0)