ASoC: Rename soc_enum.max field with items
The name "max" in struct soc_enum is rather confusing since it actually takes the number of items. With "max", one might try to assign (nitems - 1) value. Rename the field to a more appropriate one, "items", which is also used in struct snd_ctl_elem_info, too. This patch also rewrites some code like "if (x > e->nitems - 1)" with "if (x >= e->nitems)". Not only the latter improves the readability, it also fixes a potential bug when e->items is zero. Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1861,7 +1861,7 @@ static void max98095_handle_eq_pdata(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Now point the soc_enum to .texts array items */
|
||||
max98095->eq_enum.texts = max98095->eq_texts;
|
||||
max98095->eq_enum.max = max98095->eq_textcnt;
|
||||
max98095->eq_enum.items = max98095->eq_textcnt;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = snd_soc_add_codec_controls(codec, controls, ARRAY_SIZE(controls));
|
||||
if (ret != 0)
|
||||
@@ -2016,7 +2016,7 @@ static void max98095_handle_bq_pdata(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Now point the soc_enum to .texts array items */
|
||||
max98095->bq_enum.texts = max98095->bq_texts;
|
||||
max98095->bq_enum.max = max98095->bq_textcnt;
|
||||
max98095->bq_enum.items = max98095->bq_textcnt;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = snd_soc_add_codec_controls(codec, controls, ARRAY_SIZE(controls));
|
||||
if (ret != 0)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user