um: siginfo cleanup

Currently we use both struct siginfo and siginfo_t.
Let's use struct siginfo internally to avoid ongoing
compiler warning. We are allowed to do so because
struct siginfo and siginfo_t are equivalent.

Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
This commit is contained in:
Richard Weinberger
2013-07-19 11:31:36 +02:00
parent 7473534130
commit 9a8c135957
4 changed files with 15 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ void (*sig_info[NSIG])(int, struct siginfo *, struct uml_pt_regs *) = {
[SIGIO] = sigio_handler,
[SIGVTALRM] = timer_handler };
static void sig_handler_common(int sig, siginfo_t *si, mcontext_t *mc)
static void sig_handler_common(int sig, struct siginfo *si, mcontext_t *mc)
{
struct uml_pt_regs r;
int save_errno = errno;
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static void sig_handler_common(int sig, siginfo_t *si, mcontext_t *mc)
static int signals_enabled;
static unsigned int signals_pending;
void sig_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *si, mcontext_t *mc)
void sig_handler(int sig, struct siginfo *si, mcontext_t *mc)
{
int enabled;
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ void set_sigstack(void *sig_stack, int size)
panic("enabling signal stack failed, errno = %d\n", errno);
}
static void (*handlers[_NSIG])(int sig, siginfo_t *si, mcontext_t *mc) = {
static void (*handlers[_NSIG])(int sig, struct siginfo *si, mcontext_t *mc) = {
[SIGSEGV] = sig_handler,
[SIGBUS] = sig_handler,
[SIGILL] = sig_handler,
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static void hard_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *p)
while ((sig = ffs(pending)) != 0){
sig--;
pending &= ~(1 << sig);
(*handlers[sig])(sig, si, mc);
(*handlers[sig])(sig, (struct siginfo *)si, mc);
}
/*