x86/cpu: Unify CPU family, model, stepping calculation
Add generic functions which calc family, model and stepping from the CPUID_1.EAX leaf and stick them into the library we have. Rename those which do call CPUID with the prefix "x86_cpuid" as suggested by Paolo Bonzini. No functionality change. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1448273546-2567-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Ingo Molnar

parent
1ec218373b
commit
99f925ce92
@@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ void __init load_ucode_bsp(void)
|
||||
if (!have_cpuid_p())
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
vendor = x86_vendor();
|
||||
family = x86_family();
|
||||
vendor = x86_cpuid_vendor();
|
||||
family = x86_cpuid_family();
|
||||
|
||||
switch (vendor) {
|
||||
case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
|
||||
@@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ void load_ucode_ap(void)
|
||||
if (!have_cpuid_p())
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
vendor = x86_vendor();
|
||||
family = x86_family();
|
||||
vendor = x86_cpuid_vendor();
|
||||
family = x86_cpuid_family();
|
||||
|
||||
switch (vendor) {
|
||||
case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
|
||||
@@ -206,8 +206,8 @@ void reload_early_microcode(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int vendor, family;
|
||||
|
||||
vendor = x86_vendor();
|
||||
family = x86_family();
|
||||
vendor = x86_cpuid_vendor();
|
||||
family = x86_cpuid_family();
|
||||
|
||||
switch (vendor) {
|
||||
case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
|
||||
|
@@ -145,10 +145,10 @@ matching_model_microcode(struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header,
|
||||
int ext_sigcount, i;
|
||||
struct extended_signature *ext_sig;
|
||||
|
||||
fam = __x86_family(sig);
|
||||
fam = x86_family(sig);
|
||||
model = x86_model(sig);
|
||||
|
||||
fam_ucode = __x86_family(mc_header->sig);
|
||||
fam_ucode = x86_family(mc_header->sig);
|
||||
model_ucode = x86_model(mc_header->sig);
|
||||
|
||||
if (fam == fam_ucode && model == model_ucode)
|
||||
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ matching_model_microcode(struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header,
|
||||
ext_sigcount = ext_header->count;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < ext_sigcount; i++) {
|
||||
fam_ucode = __x86_family(ext_sig->sig);
|
||||
fam_ucode = x86_family(ext_sig->sig);
|
||||
model_ucode = x86_model(ext_sig->sig);
|
||||
|
||||
if (fam == fam_ucode && model == model_ucode)
|
||||
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
|
||||
native_cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
|
||||
csig.sig = eax;
|
||||
|
||||
family = __x86_family(csig.sig);
|
||||
family = x86_family(csig.sig);
|
||||
model = x86_model(csig.sig);
|
||||
|
||||
if ((model >= 5) || (family > 6)) {
|
||||
@@ -521,16 +521,12 @@ static bool __init load_builtin_intel_microcode(struct cpio_data *cp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
|
||||
unsigned int eax = 0x00000001, ebx, ecx = 0, edx;
|
||||
unsigned int family, model, stepping;
|
||||
char name[30];
|
||||
|
||||
native_cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
|
||||
|
||||
family = __x86_family(eax);
|
||||
model = x86_model(eax);
|
||||
stepping = eax & 0xf;
|
||||
|
||||
sprintf(name, "intel-ucode/%02x-%02x-%02x", family, model, stepping);
|
||||
sprintf(name, "intel-ucode/%02x-%02x-%02x",
|
||||
x86_family(eax), x86_model(eax), x86_stepping(eax));
|
||||
|
||||
return get_builtin_firmware(cp, name);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user