perf tools: Add kernel AUX area sampling definitions

Add kernel AUX area sampling definitions, which brings perf_event.h into
line with the kernel version.

New sample type PERF_SAMPLE_AUX requests a sample of the AUX area
buffer.  New perf_event_attr member 'aux_sample_size' specifies the
desired size of the sample.

Also add support for parsing samples containing AUX area data i.e.
PERF_SAMPLE_AUX.

Committer notes:

I squashed the first two patches in this series to avoid breaking
automatic bisection, i.e. after applying only the original first patch
in this series we would have:

  # perf test -v parsing
  26: Sample parsing                                        :
  --- start ---
  test child forked, pid 17018
  sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit was introduced - test needs updating
  test child finished with -1
  ---- end ----
  Sample parsing: FAILED!
  #

With the two paches combined:

  # perf test parsing
  26: Sample parsing                                        : Ok
  #

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191115124225.5247-3-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Adrian Hunter
2019-11-15 14:42:11 +02:00
committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
parent 848a5e507e
commit 98dcf14d7f
9 changed files with 59 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ group_fd=-1
flags=0|8
cpu=*
type=0|1
size=112
size=120
config=0
sample_period=*
sample_type=263

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ group_fd=-1
flags=0|8
cpu=*
type=0
size=112
size=120
config=0
sample_period=0
sample_type=65536

View File

@@ -150,6 +150,15 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR)
COMP(phys_addr);
if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_AUX) {
COMP(aux_sample.size);
if (memcmp(s1->aux_sample.data, s2->aux_sample.data,
s1->aux_sample.size)) {
pr_debug("Samples differ at 'aux_sample'\n");
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
@@ -182,6 +191,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 read_format)
u64 regs[64];
const u64 raw_data[] = {0x123456780a0b0c0dULL, 0x1102030405060708ULL};
const u64 data[] = {0x2211443366558877ULL, 0, 0xaabbccddeeff4321ULL};
const u64 aux_data[] = {0xa55a, 0, 0xeeddee, 0x0282028202820282};
struct perf_sample sample = {
.ip = 101,
.pid = 102,
@@ -218,6 +228,10 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 read_format)
.regs = regs,
},
.phys_addr = 113,
.aux_sample = {
.size = sizeof(aux_data),
.data = (void *)aux_data,
},
};
struct sample_read_value values[] = {{1, 5}, {9, 3}, {2, 7}, {6, 4},};
struct perf_sample sample_out;
@@ -317,7 +331,7 @@ int test__sample_parsing(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
* were added. Please actually update the test rather than just change
* the condition below.
*/
if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR << 1) {
if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_AUX << 1) {
pr_debug("sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit was introduced - test needs updating\n");
return -1;
}