cfg80211: remove @gfp parameter from cfg80211_rx_mgmt()
In the cfg80211_rx_mgmt(), parameter @gfp was used for the memory allocation. But, memory get allocated under spin_lock_bh(), this implies atomic context. So, one can't use GFP_KERNEL, only variants with no __GFP_WAIT. Actually, in all occurrences GFP_ATOMIC is used (wil6210 use GFP_KERNEL by mistake), and it should be this way or warning triggered in the memory allocation code. Remove @gfp parameter as no actual choice exist, and use hard coded GFP_ATOMIC for memory allocation. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev <qca_vkondrat@qca.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
此提交包含在:
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static void wmi_evt_rx_mgmt(struct wil6210_priv *wil, int id, void *d, int len)
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
cfg80211_rx_mgmt(wil->wdev, freq, signal,
|
||||
(void *)rx_mgmt_frame, d_len, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
(void *)rx_mgmt_frame, d_len, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
新增問題並參考
封鎖使用者