lkdtm: Add -fstack-protector-strong test

There wasn't an LKDTM test to distinguish between -fstack-protector and
-fstack-protector-strong in use. This adds CORRUPT_STACK_STRONG to see
the difference. Also adjusts the stack-clobber value to 0xff so execution
won't potentially jump into userspace when the stack protector is missing.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kees Cook
2017-08-04 14:34:40 -07:00
parent 7b25a85c9d
commit 93e78c6b14
3 changed files with 20 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ void lkdtm_EXCEPTION(void);
void lkdtm_LOOP(void);
void lkdtm_OVERFLOW(void);
void lkdtm_CORRUPT_STACK(void);
void lkdtm_CORRUPT_STACK_STRONG(void);
void lkdtm_UNALIGNED_LOAD_STORE_WRITE(void);
void lkdtm_SOFTLOCKUP(void);
void lkdtm_HARDLOCKUP(void);