xiaomi-sm8450/android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8450
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

sched/numa: Remove the numa_balancing_scan_period_reset sysctl

Browse Source 
With scan rate adaptions based on whether the workload has properly
converged or not there should be no need for the scan period reset
hammer. Get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1381141781-10992-60-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Mel Gorman
2013-10-07 11:29:37 +01:00
committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 04bb2f9475
commit 930aa174fc
6 changed files with 4 additions and 37 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
kernel/sysctl.c
View File

@@ -370,13 +370,6 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
},
{
.procname = "numa_balancing_scan_period_reset",
.data = &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_reset,
.maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
},
{
.procname = "numa_balancing_scan_period_max_ms",
.data = &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_max,