ipv6: do not abuse GFP_ATOMIC in inet6_netconf_notify_devconf()

All inet6_netconf_notify_devconf() callers are in process context,
so we can use GFP_KERNEL allocations if we take care of not holding
a rwlock while not needed in ip6mr (we hold RTNL there)

Fixes: d67b8c616b ("netconf: advertise mc_forwarding status")
Fixes: f3a1bfb11c ("rtnl/ipv6: use netconf msg to advertise forwarding status")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Dumazet
2016-07-08 05:46:04 +02:00
committed by David S. Miller
parent fa17806cde
commit 927265bc6c
2 changed files with 9 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@@ -1592,14 +1592,15 @@ static int ip6mr_sk_init(struct mr6_table *mrt, struct sock *sk)
if (likely(mrt->mroute6_sk == NULL)) {
mrt->mroute6_sk = sk;
net->ipv6.devconf_all->mc_forwarding++;
} else {
err = -EADDRINUSE;
}
write_unlock_bh(&mrt_lock);
if (!err)
inet6_netconf_notify_devconf(net, NETCONFA_MC_FORWARDING,
NETCONFA_IFINDEX_ALL,
net->ipv6.devconf_all);
}
else
err = -EADDRINUSE;
write_unlock_bh(&mrt_lock);
rtnl_unlock();
return err;
@@ -1617,11 +1618,11 @@ int ip6mr_sk_done(struct sock *sk)
write_lock_bh(&mrt_lock);
mrt->mroute6_sk = NULL;
net->ipv6.devconf_all->mc_forwarding--;
write_unlock_bh(&mrt_lock);
inet6_netconf_notify_devconf(net,
NETCONFA_MC_FORWARDING,
NETCONFA_IFINDEX_ALL,
net->ipv6.devconf_all);
write_unlock_bh(&mrt_lock);
mroute_clean_tables(mrt, false);
err = 0;