bpf: fix bpf_tail_call() x64 JIT
- bpf prog_array just like all other types of bpf array accepts 32-bit index. Clarify that in the comment. - fix x64 JIT of bpf_tail_call which was incorrectly loading 8 instead of 4 bytes - tighten corresponding check in the interpreter to stay consistent The JIT bug can be triggered after introduction of BPF_F_NUMA_NODE flag in commit96eabe7a40
in 4.14. Before that the map_flags would stay zero and though JIT code is wrong it will check bounds correctly. Hence two fixes tags. All other JITs don't have this problem. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Fixes:96eabe7a40
("bpf: Allow selecting numa node during map creation") Fixes:b52f00e6a7
("x86: bpf_jit: implement bpf_tail_call() helper") Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
David S. Miller

parent
05946876f0
commit
90caccdd8c
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
|
||||
* jump into another BPF program
|
||||
* @ctx: context pointer passed to next program
|
||||
* @prog_array_map: pointer to map which type is BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY
|
||||
* @index: index inside array that selects specific program to run
|
||||
* @index: 32-bit index inside array that selects specific program to run
|
||||
* Return: 0 on success or negative error
|
||||
*
|
||||
* int bpf_clone_redirect(skb, ifindex, flags)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user