xiaomi-sm8450/android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8450
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

mm: kmemleak: avoid using __va() on addresses that don't have a lowmem mapping

Browse Source 
Some of the kmemleak_*() callbacks in memblock, bootmem, CMA convert a
physical address to a virtual one using __va().  However, such physical
addresses may sometimes be located in highmem and using __va() is
incorrect, leading to inconsistent object tracking in kmemleak.

The following functions have been added to the kmemleak API and they take
a physical address as the object pointer.  They only perform the
corresponding action if the address has a lowmem mapping:

kmemleak_alloc_phys
kmemleak_free_part_phys
kmemleak_not_leak_phys
kmemleak_ignore_phys

The affected calling places have been updated to use the new kmemleak
API.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471531432-16503-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reported-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Catalin Marinas
2016-10-11 13:55:11 -07:00
committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 0549a3c02e
commit 9099daed9c
7 changed files with 83 additions and 9 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
mm/memblock.c
View File

@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
(unsigned long long)base + size - 1,
(void *)_RET_IP_);
kmemleak_free_part(__va(base), size);
kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
return memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
}
@@ -1152,7 +1152,7 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range_nid(phys_addr_t size,
* The min_count is set to 0 so that memblock allocations are
* never reported as leaks.
*/
kmemleak_alloc(__va(found), size, 0, 0);
kmemleak_alloc_phys(found, size, 0, 0);
return found;
}
return 0;
@@ -1399,7 +1399,7 @@ void __init __memblock_free_early(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
memblock_dbg("%s: [%#016llx-%#016llx] %pF\n",
__func__, (u64)base, (u64)base + size - 1,
(void *)_RET_IP_);
kmemleak_free_part(__va(base), size);
kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
}
@@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ void __init __memblock_free_late(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
memblock_dbg("%s: [%#016llx-%#016llx] %pF\n",
__func__, (u64)base, (u64)base + size - 1,
(void *)_RET_IP_);
kmemleak_free_part(__va(base), size);
kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
cursor = PFN_UP(base);
end = PFN_DOWN(base + size);