acpi/nfit, device-dax: Identify differentiated memory with a unique numa-node
Persistent memory, as described by the ACPI NFIT (NVDIMM Firmware Interface Table), is the first known instance of a memory range described by a unique "target" proximity domain. Where "initiator" and "target" proximity domains is an approach that the ACPI HMAT (Heterogeneous Memory Attributes Table) uses to described the unique performance properties of a memory range relative to a given initiator (e.g. CPU or DMA device). Currently the numa-node for a /dev/pmemX block-device or /dev/daxX.Y char-device follows the traditional notion of 'numa-node' where the attribute conveys the closest online numa-node. That numa-node attribute is useful for cpu-binding and memory-binding processes *near* the device. However, when the memory range backing a 'pmem', or 'dax' device is onlined (memory hot-add) the memory-only-numa-node representing that address needs to be differentiated from the set of online nodes. In other words, the numa-node association of the device depends on whether you can bind processes *near* the cpu-numa-node in the offline device-case, or bind process *on* the memory-range directly after the backing address range is onlined. Allow for the case that platform firmware describes persistent memory with a unique proximity domain, i.e. when it is distinct from the proximity of DRAM and CPUs that are on the same socket. Plumb the Linux numa-node translation of that proximity through the libnvdimm region device to namespaces that are in device-dax mode. With this in place the proposed kmem driver [1] can optionally discover a unique numa-node number for the address range as it transitions the memory from an offline state managed by a device-driver to an online memory range managed by the core-mm. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181022201317.8558C1D8@viggo.jf.intel.com Reported-by: Fan Du <fan.du@intel.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct dev_dax *__dax_pmem_probe(struct device *dev, enum dev_dax_subsys subsys)
|
||||
struct nd_namespace_common *ndns;
|
||||
struct nd_dax *nd_dax = to_nd_dax(dev);
|
||||
struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn = &nd_dax->nd_pfn;
|
||||
struct nd_region *nd_region = to_nd_region(dev->parent);
|
||||
|
||||
ndns = nvdimm_namespace_common_probe(dev);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(ndns))
|
||||
@@ -52,7 +53,8 @@ struct dev_dax *__dax_pmem_probe(struct device *dev, enum dev_dax_subsys subsys)
|
||||
memcpy(&res, &pgmap.res, sizeof(res));
|
||||
res.start += offset;
|
||||
dax_region = alloc_dax_region(dev, region_id, &res,
|
||||
le32_to_cpu(pfn_sb->align), PFN_DEV|PFN_MAP);
|
||||
nd_region->target_node, le32_to_cpu(pfn_sb->align),
|
||||
PFN_DEV|PFN_MAP);
|
||||
if (!dax_region)
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user