don't expose I_NEW inodes via dentry->d_inode

d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
	unlock_new_inode(inode);

is a bad idea; do it the other way round...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Al Viro
2012-07-19 09:18:15 +04:00
parent 32a7991b6a
commit 8fc37ec54c
7 changed files with 19 additions and 19 deletions

View File

@@ -634,8 +634,8 @@ static int reiserfs_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mod
reiserfs_update_inode_transaction(inode);
reiserfs_update_inode_transaction(dir);
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
retval = journal_end(&th, dir->i_sb, jbegin_count);
out_failed:
@@ -712,8 +712,8 @@ static int reiserfs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode
goto out_failed;
}
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
retval = journal_end(&th, dir->i_sb, jbegin_count);
out_failed:
@@ -800,8 +800,8 @@ static int reiserfs_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode
// the above add_entry did not update dir's stat data
reiserfs_update_sd(&th, dir);
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
retval = journal_end(&th, dir->i_sb, jbegin_count);
out_failed:
reiserfs_write_unlock_once(dir->i_sb, lock_depth);
@@ -1096,8 +1096,8 @@ static int reiserfs_symlink(struct inode *parent_dir,
goto out_failed;
}
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
retval = journal_end(&th, parent_dir->i_sb, jbegin_count);
out_failed:
reiserfs_write_unlock(parent_dir->i_sb);