don't expose I_NEW inodes via dentry->d_inode
d_instantiate(dentry, inode); unlock_new_inode(inode); is a bad idea; do it the other way round... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ static int jffs2_create(struct inode *dir_i, struct dentry *dentry,
|
||||
__func__, inode->i_ino, inode->i_mode, inode->i_nlink,
|
||||
f->inocache->pino_nlink, inode->i_mapping->nrpages);
|
||||
|
||||
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
|
||||
unlock_new_inode(inode);
|
||||
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
fail:
|
||||
@@ -446,8 +446,8 @@ static int jffs2_symlink (struct inode *dir_i, struct dentry *dentry, const char
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dir_f->sem);
|
||||
jffs2_complete_reservation(c);
|
||||
|
||||
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
|
||||
unlock_new_inode(inode);
|
||||
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
fail:
|
||||
@@ -591,8 +591,8 @@ static int jffs2_mkdir (struct inode *dir_i, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dir_f->sem);
|
||||
jffs2_complete_reservation(c);
|
||||
|
||||
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
|
||||
unlock_new_inode(inode);
|
||||
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
fail:
|
||||
@@ -766,8 +766,8 @@ static int jffs2_mknod (struct inode *dir_i, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dir_f->sem);
|
||||
jffs2_complete_reservation(c);
|
||||
|
||||
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
|
||||
unlock_new_inode(inode);
|
||||
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
fail:
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user