[SCSI] libfc: fix memory corruption caused by double frees and bad error handling
I was running into several different panics under stress, which I traced down to a few different possible slab corruption issues in error handling paths. I have not yet looked into why these exchange sends fail, but with these fixes my test system is much more stable under stress than before. fc_elsct_send() could fail and either leave the passed in frame intact (failure in fc_ct/els_fill) or the frame could have been freed if the failure was is fc_exch_seq_send(). The caller had no way of knowing, and there was a potential double free in the error handling in fc_fcp_rec(). Make fc_elsct_send() always free the frame before returning, and remove the fc_frame_free() call in fc_fcp_rec(). While fc_exch_seq_send() did always consume the frame, there were double free bugs in the error handling of fc_fcp_cmd_send() and fc_fcp_srr() as well. Numerous calls to error handling routines (fc_disc_error(), fc_lport_error(), fc_rport_error_retry() ) were passing in a frame pointer that had already been freed in the case of an error. I have changed the call sites to pass in a NULL pointer, but there may be more appropriate error codes to use. Question: Why do these error routines take a frame pointer anyway? I understand passing in a pointer encoded error to the response handlers, but the error routines take no action on a valid pointer and should never be called that way. Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
James Bottomley

parent
b7a727f1af
commit
8f550f937e
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_scr(struct fc_lport *lport)
|
||||
|
||||
if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_FCTRL, fp, ELS_SCR,
|
||||
fc_lport_scr_resp, lport, lport->e_d_tov))
|
||||
fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
|
||||
fc_lport_error(lport, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_rpn_id(struct fc_lport *lport)
|
||||
if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_DIR_SERV, fp, FC_NS_RPN_ID,
|
||||
fc_lport_rpn_id_resp,
|
||||
lport, lport->e_d_tov))
|
||||
fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
|
||||
fc_lport_error(lport, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct fc_rport_operations fc_lport_rport_ops = {
|
||||
@@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_logo(struct fc_lport *lport)
|
||||
|
||||
if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_FLOGI, fp, ELS_LOGO,
|
||||
fc_lport_logo_resp, lport, lport->e_d_tov))
|
||||
fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
|
||||
fc_lport_error(lport, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -1456,7 +1456,7 @@ void fc_lport_enter_flogi(struct fc_lport *lport)
|
||||
|
||||
if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_FLOGI, fp, ELS_FLOGI,
|
||||
fc_lport_flogi_resp, lport, lport->e_d_tov))
|
||||
fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
|
||||
fc_lport_error(lport, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Configure a fc_lport */
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user