Merge tag 'for-linus-20160324' of git://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd

Pull MTD updates from Brian Norris:
 "NAND:
   - Add sunxi_nand randomizer support
   - begin refactoring NAND ecclayout structs
   - fix pxa3xx_nand dmaengine usage
   - brcmnand: fix support for v7.1 controller
   - add Qualcomm NAND controller driver

  SPI NOR:
   - add new ls1021a, ls2080a support to Freescale QuadSPI
   - add new flash ID entries
   - support bottom-block protection for Winbond flash
   - support Status Register Write Protect
   - remove broken QPI support for Micron SPI flash

  JFFS2:
   - improve post-mount CRC scan efficiency

  General:
   - refactor bcm63xxpart parser, to later extend for NAND
   - add writebuf size parameter to mtdram

  Other minor code quality improvements"

* tag 'for-linus-20160324' of git://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd: (72 commits)
  mtd: nand: remove kerneldoc for removed function parameter
  mtd: nand: Qualcomm NAND controller driver
  dt/bindings: qcom_nandc: Add DT bindings
  mtd: nand: don't select chip in nand_chip's block_bad op
  mtd: spi-nor: support lock/unlock for a few Winbond chips
  mtd: spi-nor: add TB (Top/Bottom) protect support
  mtd: spi-nor: add SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK flag
  mtd: spi-nor: use BIT() for flash_info flags
  mtd: spi-nor: disallow further writes to SR if WP# is low
  mtd: spi-nor: make lock/unlock bounds checks more obvious and robust
  mtd: spi-nor: silently drop lock/unlock for already locked/unlocked region
  mtd: spi-nor: wait for SR_WIP to clear on initial unlock
  mtd: nand: simplify nand_bch_init() usage
  mtd: mtdswap: remove useless if (!mtd->ecclayout) test
  mtd: create an mtd_oobavail() helper and make use of it
  mtd: kill the ecclayout->oobavail field
  mtd: nand: check status before reporting timeout
  mtd: bcm63xxpart: give width specifier an 'int', not 'size_t'
  mtd: mtdram: Add parameter for setting writebuf size
  mtd: nand: pxa3xx_nand: kill unused field 'drcmr_cmd'
  ...
此提交包含在:
Linus Torvalds
2016-03-24 19:57:15 -07:00
當前提交 8f40842e42
共有 61 個檔案被更改,包括 3522 行新增590 行删除

查看文件

@@ -134,38 +134,60 @@ int jffs2_garbage_collect_pass(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&c->alloc_sem))
return -EINTR;
for (;;) {
/* We can't start doing GC until we've finished checking
the node CRCs etc. */
int bucket, want_ino;
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
if (!c->unchecked_size)
break;
/* We can't start doing GC yet. We haven't finished checking
the node CRCs etc. Do it now. */
/* checked_ino is protected by the alloc_sem */
if (c->checked_ino > c->highest_ino && xattr) {
pr_crit("Checked all inodes but still 0x%x bytes of unchecked space?\n",
c->unchecked_size);
jffs2_dbg_dump_block_lists_nolock(c);
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem);
return -ENOSPC;
}
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
if (!xattr)
xattr = jffs2_verify_xattr(c);
spin_lock(&c->inocache_lock);
/* Instead of doing the inodes in numeric order, doing a lookup
* in the hash for each possible number, just walk the hash
* buckets of *existing* inodes. This means that we process
* them out-of-order, but it can be a lot faster if there's
* a sparse inode# space. Which there often is. */
want_ino = c->check_ino;
for (bucket = c->check_ino % c->inocache_hashsize ; bucket < c->inocache_hashsize; bucket++) {
for (ic = c->inocache_list[bucket]; ic; ic = ic->next) {
if (ic->ino < want_ino)
continue;
ic = jffs2_get_ino_cache(c, c->checked_ino++);
if (ic->state != INO_STATE_CHECKEDABSENT &&
ic->state != INO_STATE_PRESENT)
goto got_next; /* with inocache_lock held */
if (!ic) {
spin_unlock(&c->inocache_lock);
continue;
jffs2_dbg(1, "Skipping ino #%u already checked\n",
ic->ino);
}
want_ino = 0;
}
/* Point c->check_ino past the end of the last bucket. */
c->check_ino = ((c->highest_ino + c->inocache_hashsize + 1) &
~c->inocache_hashsize) - 1;
spin_unlock(&c->inocache_lock);
pr_crit("Checked all inodes but still 0x%x bytes of unchecked space?\n",
c->unchecked_size);
jffs2_dbg_dump_block_lists_nolock(c);
mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem);
return -ENOSPC;
got_next:
/* For next time round the loop, we want c->checked_ino to indicate
* the *next* one we want to check. And since we're walking the
* buckets rather than doing it sequentially, it's: */
c->check_ino = ic->ino + c->inocache_hashsize;
if (!ic->pino_nlink) {
jffs2_dbg(1, "Skipping check of ino #%d with nlink/pino zero\n",
ic->ino);
@@ -176,8 +198,6 @@ int jffs2_garbage_collect_pass(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
switch(ic->state) {
case INO_STATE_CHECKEDABSENT:
case INO_STATE_PRESENT:
jffs2_dbg(1, "Skipping ino #%u already checked\n",
ic->ino);
spin_unlock(&c->inocache_lock);
continue;
@@ -196,7 +216,7 @@ int jffs2_garbage_collect_pass(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
ic->ino);
/* We need to come back again for the _same_ inode. We've
made no progress in this case, but that should be OK */
c->checked_ino--;
c->check_ino = ic->ino;
mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem);
sleep_on_spinunlock(&c->inocache_wq, &c->inocache_lock);

查看文件

@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct jffs2_sb_info {
struct mtd_info *mtd;
uint32_t highest_ino;
uint32_t checked_ino;
uint32_t check_ino; /* *NEXT* inode to be checked */
unsigned int flags;

查看文件

@@ -846,8 +846,8 @@ int jffs2_thread_should_wake(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
return 1;
if (c->unchecked_size) {
jffs2_dbg(1, "jffs2_thread_should_wake(): unchecked_size %d, checked_ino #%d\n",
c->unchecked_size, c->checked_ino);
jffs2_dbg(1, "jffs2_thread_should_wake(): unchecked_size %d, check_ino #%d\n",
c->unchecked_size, c->check_ino);
return 1;
}

查看文件

@@ -1183,22 +1183,20 @@ void jffs2_dirty_trigger(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
int jffs2_nand_flash_setup(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
{
struct nand_ecclayout *oinfo = c->mtd->ecclayout;
if (!c->mtd->oobsize)
return 0;
/* Cleanmarker is out-of-band, so inline size zero */
c->cleanmarker_size = 0;
if (!oinfo || oinfo->oobavail == 0) {
if (c->mtd->oobavail == 0) {
pr_err("inconsistent device description\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
jffs2_dbg(1, "using OOB on NAND\n");
c->oobavail = oinfo->oobavail;
c->oobavail = c->mtd->oobavail;
/* Initialise write buffer */
init_rwsem(&c->wbuf_sem);