cnic: Fix parity error code conflict

The recently added parity error handling used an error code that was
already defined for a different error.  This could lead to bnx2x
firmware assert.  We need to fix this with new error codes that are
defined for parity error only.

Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Wai <eddie.wai@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi <bprakash@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Michael Chan
2012-03-21 15:38:34 +00:00
committed by David S. Miller
parent 7ae5289017
commit 8ec3e70207
5 changed files with 12 additions and 34 deletions

View File

@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
#include "bnx2x/bnx2x_hsi.h"
#include "../../../scsi/bnx2i/57xx_iscsi_constants.h"
#include "../../../scsi/bnx2i/57xx_iscsi_hsi.h"
#include "../../../scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_constants.h"
#include "cnic.h"
#include "cnic_defs.h"
@@ -2547,7 +2548,7 @@ static void cnic_bnx2x_kwqe_err(struct cnic_dev *dev, struct kwqe *kwqe)
}
kcqe.kcqe_op_flag = kcqe_op << KCQE_FLAGS_OPCODE_SHIFT;
kcqe.kcqe_op_flag |= KCQE_FLAGS_LAYER_MASK_L5_FCOE;
kcqe.kcqe_info1 = FCOE_KCQE_COMPLETION_STATUS_NIC_ERROR;
kcqe.kcqe_info1 = FCOE_KCQE_COMPLETION_STATUS_PARITY_ERROR;
kcqe.kcqe_info2 = cid;
kcqe.kcqe_info0 = l5_cid;
@@ -2558,7 +2559,7 @@ static void cnic_bnx2x_kwqe_err(struct cnic_dev *dev, struct kwqe *kwqe)
kcqe.kcqe_op_flag = (opcode + 0x10) << KCQE_FLAGS_OPCODE_SHIFT;
kcqe.kcqe_op_flag |= KCQE_FLAGS_LAYER_MASK_L5_ISCSI;
kcqe.kcqe_info1 = ISCSI_KCQE_COMPLETION_STATUS_NIC_ERROR;
kcqe.kcqe_info1 = ISCSI_KCQE_COMPLETION_STATUS_PARITY_ERR;
kcqe.kcqe_info2 = cid;
cnic_get_l5_cid(cp, BNX2X_SW_CID(cid), &kcqe.kcqe_info0);
@@ -2577,7 +2578,7 @@ static void cnic_bnx2x_kwqe_err(struct cnic_dev *dev, struct kwqe *kwqe)
kcqe.kcqe_op_flag = (kcqe_op << KCQE_FLAGS_OPCODE_SHIFT) |
KCQE_FLAGS_LAYER_MASK_L4;
l4kcqe->status = L4_KCQE_COMPLETION_STATUS_NIC_ERROR;
l4kcqe->status = L4_KCQE_COMPLETION_STATUS_PARITY_ERROR;
l4kcqe->cid = cid;
cnic_get_l5_cid(cp, BNX2X_SW_CID(cid), &l4kcqe->conn_id);
} else {
@@ -3933,7 +3934,8 @@ static void cnic_cm_process_kcqe(struct cnic_dev *dev, struct kcqe *kcqe)
case L4_KCQE_OPCODE_VALUE_CONNECT_COMPLETE:
if (l4kcqe->status == 0)
set_bit(SK_F_OFFLD_COMPLETE, &csk->flags);
else if (l4kcqe->status == L4_KCQE_COMPLETION_STATUS_NIC_ERROR)
else if (l4kcqe->status ==
L4_KCQE_COMPLETION_STATUS_PARITY_ERROR)
set_bit(SK_F_HW_ERR, &csk->flags);
smp_mb__before_clear_bit();
@@ -3946,7 +3948,7 @@ static void cnic_cm_process_kcqe(struct cnic_dev *dev, struct kcqe *kcqe)
case L4_KCQE_OPCODE_VALUE_RESET_COMP:
case L5CM_RAMROD_CMD_ID_SEARCHER_DELETE:
case L5CM_RAMROD_CMD_ID_TERMINATE_OFFLOAD:
if (l4kcqe->status == L4_KCQE_COMPLETION_STATUS_NIC_ERROR)
if (l4kcqe->status == L4_KCQE_COMPLETION_STATUS_PARITY_ERROR)
set_bit(SK_F_HW_ERR, &csk->flags);
cp->close_conn(csk, opcode);