s390: rename psw_bits enums
The address space enums that must be used when modifying the address space part of a psw with the psw_bits() macro can easily be confused with the psw defines that are used to mask and compare directly the mask part of a psw. We have e.g. PSW_AS_PRIMARY vs PSW_ASC_PRIMARY. To avoid confusion rename the PSW_AS_* enums to PSW_BITS_AS_*. In addition also rename the PSW_AMODE_* enums, so they also follow the same naming scheme: PSW_BITS_AMODE_*. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Martin Schwidefsky

parent
60c497014e
commit
8bb3fdd686
@@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ static inline unsigned long kvm_s390_logical_to_effective(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
|
||||
{
|
||||
psw_t *psw = &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw;
|
||||
|
||||
if (psw_bits(*psw).eaba == PSW_AMODE_64BIT)
|
||||
if (psw_bits(*psw).eaba == PSW_BITS_AMODE_64BIT)
|
||||
return ga;
|
||||
if (psw_bits(*psw).eaba == PSW_AMODE_31BIT)
|
||||
if (psw_bits(*psw).eaba == PSW_BITS_AMODE_31BIT)
|
||||
return ga & ((1UL << 31) - 1);
|
||||
return ga & ((1UL << 24) - 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user