Merge tag 'kvm-3.9-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm
Pull KVM updates from Marcelo Tosatti: "KVM updates for the 3.9 merge window, including x86 real mode emulation fixes, stronger memory slot interface restrictions, mmu_lock spinlock hold time reduction, improved handling of large page faults on shadow, initial APICv HW acceleration support, s390 channel IO based virtio, amongst others" * tag 'kvm-3.9-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm: (143 commits) Revert "KVM: MMU: lazily drop large spte" x86: pvclock kvm: align allocation size to page size KVM: nVMX: Remove redundant get_vmcs12 from nested_vmx_exit_handled_msr x86 emulator: fix parity calculation for AAD instruction KVM: PPC: BookE: Handle alignment interrupts booke: Added DBCR4 SPR number KVM: PPC: booke: Allow multiple exception types KVM: PPC: booke: use vcpu reference from thread_struct KVM: Remove user_alloc from struct kvm_memory_slot KVM: VMX: disable apicv by default KVM: s390: Fix handling of iscs. KVM: MMU: cleanup __direct_map KVM: MMU: remove pt_access in mmu_set_spte KVM: MMU: cleanup mapping-level KVM: MMU: lazily drop large spte KVM: VMX: cleanup vmx_set_cr0(). KVM: VMX: add missing exit names to VMX_EXIT_REASONS array KVM: VMX: disable SMEP feature when guest is in non-paging mode KVM: Remove duplicate text in api.txt Revert "KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_free_page" ...
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4374,7 +4374,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(yield);
|
||||
* It's the caller's job to ensure that the target task struct
|
||||
* can't go away on us before we can do any checks.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns true if we indeed boosted the target task.
|
||||
* Returns:
|
||||
* true (>0) if we indeed boosted the target task.
|
||||
* false (0) if we failed to boost the target.
|
||||
* -ESRCH if there's no task to yield to.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool __sched yield_to(struct task_struct *p, bool preempt)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -4388,6 +4391,15 @@ bool __sched yield_to(struct task_struct *p, bool preempt)
|
||||
|
||||
again:
|
||||
p_rq = task_rq(p);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we're the only runnable task on the rq and target rq also
|
||||
* has only one task, there's absolutely no point in yielding.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (rq->nr_running == 1 && p_rq->nr_running == 1) {
|
||||
yielded = -ESRCH;
|
||||
goto out_irq;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
double_rq_lock(rq, p_rq);
|
||||
while (task_rq(p) != p_rq) {
|
||||
double_rq_unlock(rq, p_rq);
|
||||
@@ -4395,13 +4407,13 @@ again:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!curr->sched_class->yield_to_task)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
if (curr->sched_class != p->sched_class)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
if (task_running(p_rq, p) || p->state)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
yielded = curr->sched_class->yield_to_task(rq, p, preempt);
|
||||
if (yielded) {
|
||||
@@ -4414,11 +4426,12 @@ again:
|
||||
resched_task(p_rq->curr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
out_unlock:
|
||||
double_rq_unlock(rq, p_rq);
|
||||
out_irq:
|
||||
local_irq_restore(flags);
|
||||
|
||||
if (yielded)
|
||||
if (yielded > 0)
|
||||
schedule();
|
||||
|
||||
return yielded;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user