f2fs: fix conditions to remain recovery information in f2fs_sync_file
This patch revisited whole the recovery information during the f2fs_sync_file. In this patch, there are three information to make a decision. a) IS_CHECKPOINTED, /* is it checkpointed before? */ b) HAS_FSYNCED_INODE, /* is the inode fsynced before? */ c) HAS_LAST_FSYNC, /* has the latest node fsync mark? */ And, the scenarios for our rule are based on: [Term] F: fsync_mark, D: dentry_mark 1. inode(x) | CP | inode(x) | dnode(F) 2. inode(x) | CP | inode(F) | dnode(F) 3. inode(x) | CP | dnode(F) | inode(x) | inode(F) 4. inode(x) | CP | dnode(F) | inode(F) 5. CP | inode(x) | dnode(F) | inode(DF) 6. CP | inode(DF) | dnode(F) 7. CP | dnode(F) | inode(DF) 8. CP | dnode(F) | inode(x) | inode(DF) For example, #3, the three conditions should be changed as follows. inode(x) | CP | dnode(F) | inode(x) | inode(F) a) x o o o o b) x x x x o c) x o o x o If f2fs_sync_file stops ------^, it should write inode(F) --------------^ So, the need_inode_block_update should return true, since c) get_nat_flag(e, HAS_LAST_FSYNC), is false. For example, #8, CP | alloc | dnode(F) | inode(x) | inode(DF) a) o x x x x b) x x x o c) o o x o If f2fs_sync_file stops -------^, it should write inode(DF) --------------^ Note that, the roll-forward policy should follow this rule, which means, if there are any missing blocks, we doesn't need to recover that inode. Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
此提交包含在:
@@ -1089,9 +1089,6 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb,
|
||||
if (check_direct_IO(inode, rw, iter, offset))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* clear fsync mark to recover these blocks */
|
||||
fsync_mark_clear(F2FS_I_SB(inode), inode->i_ino);
|
||||
|
||||
trace_f2fs_direct_IO_enter(inode, offset, count, rw);
|
||||
|
||||
err = blockdev_direct_IO(rw, iocb, inode, iter, offset, get_data_block);
|
||||
|
新增問題並參考
封鎖使用者