bonding: replace SLAVE_IS_OK() with bond_slave_can_tx()
They're verifying the same thing (except of IFF_UP, which is implied for netif_running(), which is also a prerequisite). CC: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@gmail.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
David S. Miller

parent
891ab54d66
commit
8557cd74ca
@@ -3850,14 +3850,14 @@ static int bond_ethtool_get_settings(struct net_device *bond_dev,
|
||||
ecmd->duplex = DUPLEX_UNKNOWN;
|
||||
ecmd->port = PORT_OTHER;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Since SLAVE_IS_OK returns false for all inactive or down slaves, we
|
||||
/* Since bond_slave_can_tx returns false for all inactive or down slaves, we
|
||||
* do not need to check mode. Though link speed might not represent
|
||||
* the true receive or transmit bandwidth (not all modes are symmetric)
|
||||
* this is an accurate maximum.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
read_lock(&bond->lock);
|
||||
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
|
||||
if (SLAVE_IS_OK(slave)) {
|
||||
if (bond_slave_can_tx(slave)) {
|
||||
if (slave->speed != SPEED_UNKNOWN)
|
||||
speed += slave->speed;
|
||||
if (ecmd->duplex == DUPLEX_UNKNOWN &&
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user