drm/vmwgfx: Modify the resource validation interface
Allow selecting interruptible or uninterruptible waits to match expectations of callers. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Reviewed-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat@vmware.com> Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh <syeh@vmware.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -587,15 +587,18 @@ out_no_unbind:
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* vmw_resource_validate - Make a resource up-to-date and visible
|
||||
* to the device.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @res: The resource to make visible to the device.
|
||||
* @res: The resource to make visible to the device.
|
||||
* @intr: Perform waits interruptible if possible.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* On succesful return, any backup DMA buffer pointed to by @res->backup will
|
||||
* be reserved and validated.
|
||||
* On hardware resource shortage, this function will repeatedly evict
|
||||
* resources of the same type until the validation succeeds.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Return: Zero on success, -ERESTARTSYS if interrupted, negative error code
|
||||
* on failure.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int vmw_resource_validate(struct vmw_resource *res)
|
||||
int vmw_resource_validate(struct vmw_resource *res, bool intr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
struct vmw_resource *evict_res;
|
||||
@@ -633,7 +636,7 @@ int vmw_resource_validate(struct vmw_resource *res)
|
||||
write_unlock(&dev_priv->resource_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Trylock backup buffers with a NULL ticket. */
|
||||
ret = vmw_resource_do_evict(NULL, evict_res, true);
|
||||
ret = vmw_resource_do_evict(NULL, evict_res, intr);
|
||||
if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
|
||||
write_lock(&dev_priv->resource_lock);
|
||||
list_add_tail(&evict_res->lru_head, lru_list);
|
||||
@@ -914,7 +917,7 @@ int vmw_resource_pin(struct vmw_resource *res, bool interruptible)
|
||||
/* Do we really need to pin the MOB as well? */
|
||||
vmw_bo_pin_reserved(vbo, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
ret = vmw_resource_validate(res);
|
||||
ret = vmw_resource_validate(res, interruptible);
|
||||
if (vbo)
|
||||
ttm_bo_unreserve(&vbo->base);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user