locks: update comments that refer to inode->i_flock

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Layton
2015-01-21 20:44:01 -05:00
parent 3d8e560de4
commit 8116bf4cb6
2 changed files with 11 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@@ -925,12 +925,11 @@ int locks_in_grace(struct net *);
* FIXME: should we create a separate "struct lock_request" to help distinguish
* these two uses?
*
* The i_flock list is ordered by:
* The varous i_flctx lists are ordered by:
*
* 1) lock type -- FL_LEASEs first, then FL_FLOCK, and finally FL_POSIX
* 2) lock owner
* 3) lock range start
* 4) lock range end
* 1) lock owner
* 2) lock range start
* 3) lock range end
*
* Obviously, the last two criteria only matter for POSIX locks.
*/
@@ -1992,8 +1991,9 @@ static inline int break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode)
{
/*
* Since this check is lockless, we must ensure that any refcounts
* taken are done before checking inode->i_flock. Otherwise, we could
* end up racing with tasks trying to set a new lease on this file.
* taken are done before checking i_flctx->flc_lease. Otherwise, we
* could end up racing with tasks trying to set a new lease on this
* file.
*/
smp_mb();
if (inode->i_flctx && !list_empty_careful(&inode->i_flctx->flc_lease))
@@ -2005,8 +2005,9 @@ static inline int break_deleg(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode)
{
/*
* Since this check is lockless, we must ensure that any refcounts
* taken are done before checking inode->i_flock. Otherwise, we could
* end up racing with tasks trying to set a new lease on this file.
* taken are done before checking i_flctx->flc_lease. Otherwise, we
* could end up racing with tasks trying to set a new lease on this
* file.
*/
smp_mb();
if (inode->i_flctx && !list_empty_careful(&inode->i_flctx->flc_lease))