Merge tag 'seccomp-v5.7-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux
Pull seccomp updates from Kees Cook: "A couple of seccomp updates. They're both mostly bug fixes that I wanted to have sit in linux-next for a while: - allow TSYNC and USER_NOTIF together (Tycho Andersen) - add missing compat_ioctl for notify (Sven Schnelle)" * tag 'seccomp-v5.7-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux: seccomp: Add missing compat_ioctl for notify seccomp: allow TSYNC and USER_NOTIF together
This commit is contained in:
@@ -212,6 +212,10 @@ struct seccomp_notif_sizes {
|
||||
#define SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE 0x00000001
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC_ESRCH
|
||||
#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC_ESRCH (1UL << 4)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef seccomp
|
||||
int seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags, void *args)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -2187,7 +2191,8 @@ TEST(detect_seccomp_filter_flags)
|
||||
unsigned int flags[] = { SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC,
|
||||
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG,
|
||||
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_SPEC_ALLOW,
|
||||
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER };
|
||||
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER,
|
||||
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC_ESRCH };
|
||||
unsigned int exclusive[] = {
|
||||
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC,
|
||||
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER };
|
||||
@@ -2645,6 +2650,55 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_one_divergence)
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(SIBLING_EXIT_UNKILLED, (long)status);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_one_divergence_no_tid_in_err)
|
||||
{
|
||||
long ret, flags;
|
||||
void *status;
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0)) {
|
||||
TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0, &self->root_prog);
|
||||
ASSERT_NE(ENOSYS, errno) {
|
||||
TH_LOG("Kernel does not support seccomp syscall!");
|
||||
}
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) {
|
||||
TH_LOG("Kernel does not support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER!");
|
||||
}
|
||||
self->sibling[0].diverge = 1;
|
||||
tsync_start_sibling(&self->sibling[0]);
|
||||
tsync_start_sibling(&self->sibling[1]);
|
||||
|
||||
while (self->sibling_count < TSYNC_SIBLINGS) {
|
||||
sem_wait(&self->started);
|
||||
self->sibling_count++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
flags = SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC | \
|
||||
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC_ESRCH;
|
||||
ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flags, &self->apply_prog);
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(ESRCH, errno) {
|
||||
TH_LOG("Did not return ESRCH for diverged sibling.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(-1, ret) {
|
||||
TH_LOG("Did not fail on diverged sibling.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wake the threads */
|
||||
pthread_mutex_lock(&self->mutex);
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_cond_broadcast(&self->cond)) {
|
||||
TH_LOG("cond broadcast non-zero");
|
||||
}
|
||||
pthread_mutex_unlock(&self->mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Ensure they are both unkilled. */
|
||||
PTHREAD_JOIN(self->sibling[0].tid, &status);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(SIBLING_EXIT_UNKILLED, (long)status);
|
||||
PTHREAD_JOIN(self->sibling[1].tid, &status);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(SIBLING_EXIT_UNKILLED, (long)status);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter)
|
||||
{
|
||||
long ret, sib;
|
||||
@@ -3196,6 +3250,24 @@ TEST(user_notification_basic)
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(0, WEXITSTATUS(status));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(user_notification_with_tsync)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
unsigned int flags;
|
||||
|
||||
/* these were exclusive */
|
||||
flags = SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER |
|
||||
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC;
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(-1, user_trap_syscall(__NR_getppid, flags));
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
|
||||
|
||||
/* but now they're not */
|
||||
flags |= SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC_ESRCH;
|
||||
ret = user_trap_syscall(__NR_getppid, flags);
|
||||
close(ret);
|
||||
ASSERT_LE(0, ret);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(user_notification_kill_in_middle)
|
||||
{
|
||||
pid_t pid;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user