xiaomi-sm8450/android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8450
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

tcp/dccp: get rid of central timewait timer

Browse Source 
Using a timer wheel for timewait sockets was nice ~15 years ago when
memory was expensive and machines had a single processor.

This does not scale, code is ugly and source of huge latencies
(Typically 30 ms have been seen, cpus spinning on death_lock spinlock.)

We can afford to use an extra 64 bytes per timewait sock and spread
timewait load to all cpus to have better behavior.

Tested:

On following test, /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_tw_recycle is set to 1
on the target (lpaa24)

Before patch :

lpaa23:~# ./super_netperf 200 -H lpaa24 -t TCP_CC -l 60 -- -p0,0
419594

lpaa23:~# ./super_netperf 200 -H lpaa24 -t TCP_CC -l 60 -- -p0,0
437171

While test is running, we can observe 25 or even 33 ms latencies.

lpaa24:~# ping -c 1000 -i 0.02 -qn lpaa23
...
1000 packets transmitted, 1000 received, 0% packet loss, time 20601ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.020/0.217/25.771/1.535 ms, pipe 2

lpaa24:~# ping -c 1000 -i 0.02 -qn lpaa23
...
1000 packets transmitted, 1000 received, 0% packet loss, time 20702ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.019/0.183/33.761/1.441 ms, pipe 2

After patch :

About 90% increase of throughput :

lpaa23:~# ./super_netperf 200 -H lpaa24 -t TCP_CC -l 60 -- -p0,0
810442

lpaa23:~# ./super_netperf 200 -H lpaa24 -t TCP_CC -l 60 -- -p0,0
800992

And latencies are kept to minimal values during this load, even
if network utilization is 90% higher :

lpaa24:~# ping -c 1000 -i 0.02 -qn lpaa23
...
1000 packets transmitted, 1000 received, 0% packet loss, time 19991ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.023/0.064/0.360/0.042 ms

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Dumazet
2015-04-12 18:51:09 -07:00
committed by David S. Miller
parent 20a1d16526
commit 789f558cfb
11 changed files with 68 additions and 385 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

19
net/dccp/minisocks.c
View File

@@ -27,28 +27,16 @@
struct inet_timewait_death_row dccp_death_row = {
.sysctl_max_tw_buckets = NR_FILE * 2,
.period = DCCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN / INET_TWDR_TWKILL_SLOTS,
.death_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(dccp_death_row.death_lock),
.hashinfo = &dccp_hashinfo,
.tw_timer = TIMER_INITIALIZER(inet_twdr_hangman, 0,
(unsigned long)&dccp_death_row),
.twkill_work = __WORK_INITIALIZER(dccp_death_row.twkill_work,
inet_twdr_twkill_work),
/* Short-time timewait calendar */
.twcal_hand = -1,
.twcal_timer = TIMER_INITIALIZER(inet_twdr_twcal_tick, 0,
(unsigned long)&dccp_death_row),
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dccp_death_row);
void dccp_time_wait(struct sock *sk, int state, int timeo)
{
struct inet_timewait_sock *tw = NULL;
struct inet_timewait_sock *tw;
if (dccp_death_row.tw_count < dccp_death_row.sysctl_max_tw_buckets)
tw = inet_twsk_alloc(sk, state);
tw = inet_twsk_alloc(sk, &dccp_death_row, state);
if (tw != NULL) {
const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
@@ -71,8 +59,7 @@ void dccp_time_wait(struct sock *sk, int state, int timeo)
if (state == DCCP_TIME_WAIT)
timeo = DCCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN;
inet_twsk_schedule(tw, &dccp_death_row, timeo,
DCCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
inet_twsk_schedule(tw, timeo);
inet_twsk_put(tw);
} else {
/* Sorry, if we're out of memory, just CLOSE this