ARM: 7685/1: delay: use private ticks_per_jiffy field for timer-based delay ops
Commit 70264367a2
("ARM: 7653/2: do not scale loops_per_jiffy when
using a constant delay clock") fixed a problem with our timer-based
delay loop, where loops_per_jiffy is scaled by cpufreq yet used directly
by the timer delay ops.
This patch fixes the problem in a more elegant way by keeping a private
ticks_per_jiffy field in the delay ops, independent of loops_per_jiffy
and therefore not subject to scaling. The loop-based delay continues to
use loops_per_jiffy directly, as it should.
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Russell King

parent
93dc68876b
commit
6f3d90e556
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ extern struct arm_delay_ops {
|
||||
void (*delay)(unsigned long);
|
||||
void (*const_udelay)(unsigned long);
|
||||
void (*udelay)(unsigned long);
|
||||
bool const_clock;
|
||||
unsigned long ticks_per_jiffy;
|
||||
} arm_delay_ops;
|
||||
|
||||
#define __delay(n) arm_delay_ops.delay(n)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user