drm/i915: Use pipe_name() instead of the pipe number
Yet other direct usages of the pipe number instead of pipe_name(). We've been tracking them lately but managed to miss these last ones. v2: Catch them all! (Ville) Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (v1) Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Daniel Vetter

parent
45c5f2022c
commit
6f2bcceb27
@@ -10762,11 +10762,11 @@ static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
encoder->connectors_active = false;
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[ENCODER:%d:%s] hw state readout: %s, pipe=%i\n",
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[ENCODER:%d:%s] hw state readout: %s, pipe %c\n",
|
||||
encoder->base.base.id,
|
||||
drm_get_encoder_name(&encoder->base),
|
||||
encoder->base.crtc ? "enabled" : "disabled",
|
||||
pipe);
|
||||
pipe_name(pipe));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(connector, &dev->mode_config.connector_list,
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user