push BKL down into ->put_super

Move BKL into ->put_super from the only caller.  A couple of
filesystems had trivial enough ->put_super (only kfree and NULLing of
s_fs_info + stuff in there) to not get any locking: coda, cramfs, efs,
hugetlbfs, omfs, qnx4, shmem, all others got the full treatment.  Most
of them probably don't need it, but I'd rather sort that out individually.
Preferably after all the other BKL pushdowns in that area.

[AV: original used to move lock_super() down as well; these changes are
removed since we don't do lock_super() at all in generic_shutdown_super()
now]
[AV: fuse, btrfs and xfs are known to need no damn BKL, exempt]

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-05 15:40:36 +02:00
committed by Al Viro
parent a9e220f832
commit 6cfd014842
33 changed files with 133 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@@ -1684,6 +1684,9 @@ static void ubifs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
ubifs_msg("un-mount UBI device %d, volume %d", c->vi.ubi_num,
c->vi.vol_id);
lock_kernel();
/*
* The following asserts are only valid if there has not been a failure
* of the media. For example, there will be dirty inodes if we failed
@@ -1750,6 +1753,8 @@ static void ubifs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
ubi_close_volume(c->ubi);
mutex_unlock(&c->umount_mutex);
kfree(c);
unlock_kernel();
}
static int ubifs_remount_fs(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)