x86/fpu: Decouple fpregs_activate()/fpregs_deactivate() from fpu->fpregs_active

The fpregs_activate()/fpregs_deactivate() are currently called in such a pattern:

	if (!fpu->fpregs_active)
		fpregs_activate(fpu);

	...

	if (fpu->fpregs_active)
		fpregs_deactivate(fpu);

But note that it's actually safe to call them without checking the flag first.

This further decouples the fpu->fpregs_active flag from actual FPU logic.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170923130016.21448-20-mingo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h

@@ -526,8 +526,6 @@ static inline int fpregs_state_valid(struct fpu *fpu, unsigned int cpu)
  */
 static inline void fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu)
 {
-	WARN_ON_FPU(!fpu->fpregs_active);
-
 	fpu->fpregs_active = 0;
 	this_cpu_write(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx, NULL);
 	trace_x86_fpu_regs_deactivated(fpu);
@@ -535,8 +533,6 @@ static inline void fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu)
 
 static inline void fpregs_activate(struct fpu *fpu)
 {
-	WARN_ON_FPU(fpu->fpregs_active);
-
 	fpu->fpregs_active = 1;
 	this_cpu_write(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx, fpu);
 	trace_x86_fpu_regs_activated(fpu);
@@ -604,8 +600,7 @@ static inline void user_fpu_begin(void)
 	struct fpu *fpu = &current->thread.fpu;
 
 	preempt_disable();
-	if (!fpu->fpregs_active)
-		fpregs_activate(fpu);
+	fpregs_activate(fpu);
 	preempt_enable();
 }