locking/atomics: COCCINELLE/treewide: Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() patterns to READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE()
Please do not apply this to mainline directly, instead please re-run the coccinelle script shown below and apply its output. For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't harmful, and changing them results in churn. However, for some features, the read/write distinction is critical to correct operation. To distinguish these cases, separate read/write accessors must be used. This patch migrates (most) remaining ACCESS_ONCE() instances to {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), using the following coccinelle script: ---- // Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() uses to equivalent READ_ONCE() and // WRITE_ONCE() // $ make coccicheck COCCI=/home/mark/once.cocci SPFLAGS="--include-headers" MODE=patch virtual patch @ depends on patch @ expression E1, E2; @@ - ACCESS_ONCE(E1) = E2 + WRITE_ONCE(E1, E2) @ depends on patch @ expression E; @@ - ACCESS_ONCE(E) + READ_ONCE(E) ---- Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: davem@davemloft.net Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au Cc: shuah@kernel.org Cc: snitzer@redhat.com Cc: thor.thayer@linux.intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508792849-3115-19-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Ingo Molnar

parent
b03a0fe0c5
commit
6aa7de0591
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static void __cache_size_refresh(void)
|
||||
BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dm_bufio_clients_lock));
|
||||
BUG_ON(dm_bufio_client_count < 0);
|
||||
|
||||
dm_bufio_cache_size_latch = ACCESS_ONCE(dm_bufio_cache_size);
|
||||
dm_bufio_cache_size_latch = READ_ONCE(dm_bufio_cache_size);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Use default if set to 0 and report the actual cache size used.
|
||||
@@ -960,7 +960,7 @@ static void __get_memory_limit(struct dm_bufio_client *c,
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long buffers;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(dm_bufio_cache_size) != dm_bufio_cache_size_latch)) {
|
||||
if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(dm_bufio_cache_size) != dm_bufio_cache_size_latch)) {
|
||||
if (mutex_trylock(&dm_bufio_clients_lock)) {
|
||||
__cache_size_refresh();
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dm_bufio_clients_lock);
|
||||
@@ -1600,7 +1600,7 @@ static bool __try_evict_buffer(struct dm_buffer *b, gfp_t gfp)
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned long get_retain_buffers(struct dm_bufio_client *c)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long retain_bytes = ACCESS_ONCE(dm_bufio_retain_bytes);
|
||||
unsigned long retain_bytes = READ_ONCE(dm_bufio_retain_bytes);
|
||||
return retain_bytes >> (c->sectors_per_block_bits + SECTOR_SHIFT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1647,7 +1647,7 @@ dm_bufio_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct dm_bufio_client *c = container_of(shrink, struct dm_bufio_client, shrinker);
|
||||
|
||||
return ACCESS_ONCE(c->n_buffers[LIST_CLEAN]) + ACCESS_ONCE(c->n_buffers[LIST_DIRTY]);
|
||||
return READ_ONCE(c->n_buffers[LIST_CLEAN]) + READ_ONCE(c->n_buffers[LIST_DIRTY]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@@ -1818,7 +1818,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dm_bufio_set_sector_offset);
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned get_max_age_hz(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned max_age = ACCESS_ONCE(dm_bufio_max_age);
|
||||
unsigned max_age = READ_ONCE(dm_bufio_max_age);
|
||||
|
||||
if (max_age > UINT_MAX / HZ)
|
||||
max_age = UINT_MAX / HZ;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user