KVM: x86: make hwapic_isr_update and hwapic_irr_update look the same
Neither APICv nor AVIC actually need the first argument of hwapic_isr_update, but the vCPU makes more sense than passing the pointer to the whole virtual machine! In fact in the APICv case it's just happening that the vCPU is used implicitly, through the loaded VMCS. The second argument instead is named differently, make it consistent. Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static inline void apic_set_isr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic)
|
||||
* just set SVI.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(vcpu->arch.apicv_active))
|
||||
kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_isr_update(vcpu->kvm, vec);
|
||||
kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_isr_update(vcpu, vec);
|
||||
else {
|
||||
++apic->isr_count;
|
||||
BUG_ON(apic->isr_count > MAX_APIC_VECTOR);
|
||||
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ static inline void apic_clear_isr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic)
|
||||
* and must be left alone.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(vcpu->arch.apicv_active))
|
||||
kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_isr_update(vcpu->kvm,
|
||||
kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_isr_update(vcpu,
|
||||
apic_find_highest_isr(apic));
|
||||
else {
|
||||
--apic->isr_count;
|
||||
@@ -1965,7 +1965,7 @@ void kvm_apic_post_state_restore(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
|
||||
kvm_x86_ops->apicv_post_state_restore(vcpu);
|
||||
kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_irr_update(vcpu,
|
||||
apic_find_highest_irr(apic));
|
||||
kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_isr_update(vcpu->kvm,
|
||||
kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_isr_update(vcpu,
|
||||
apic_find_highest_isr(apic));
|
||||
}
|
||||
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user