drm/i915: Separate cherryview from valleyview

The cherryview device shares many characteristics with the valleyview
device.  When support was added to the driver for cherryview, the
corresponding device info structure included .is_valleyview = 1.
This is not correct and leads to some confusion.

This patch changes .is_valleyview to .is_cherryview in the cherryview
device info structure and simplifies the IS_CHERRYVIEW macro.
Then where appropriate, instances of IS_VALLEYVIEW are replaced with
IS_VALLEYVIEW || IS_CHERRYVIEW or equivalent.

v2: Use IS_VALLEYVIEW || IS_CHERRYVIEW instead of defining a new macro.
    Also add followup patches to fix issues discovered during the first
    review. (Ville)
v3: Fix some style issues and one gen check. Remove CRT related changes
    as CRT is not supported on CHV. (Imre, Ville)
v4: Make a few more optimizations. (Ville)

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wayne Boyer <wayne.boyer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1449692975-14803-1-git-send-email-wayne.boyer@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Wayne Boyer
2015-12-09 12:29:35 -08:00
committed by Daniel Vetter
부모 825f272895
커밋 666a45379e
23개의 변경된 파일147개의 추가작업 그리고 142개의 파일을 삭제

파일 보기

@@ -326,8 +326,8 @@ static bool intel_psr_match_conditions(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
return false;
}
if (!IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev) && ((dev_priv->vbt.psr.full_link) ||
(dig_port->port != PORT_A))) {
if (!IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev) && !IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev) &&
((dev_priv->vbt.psr.full_link) || (dig_port->port != PORT_A))) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: Link Standby requested/needed but not supported on this platform\n");
return false;
}
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ void intel_psr_single_frame_update(struct drm_device *dev,
* Single frame update is already supported on BDW+ but it requires
* many W/A and it isn't really needed.
*/
if (!IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
if (!IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev) && !IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev))
return;
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);