powerpc: Add support for relative exception tables
This halves the exception table size on 64-bit builds, and it allows build-time sorting of exception tables to work on relocated kernels. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> [mpe: Minor asm fixups and bits to keep the selftests working] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Michael Ellerman

parent
24bfa6a9e0
commit
61a92f7031
@@ -785,9 +785,9 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_601)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define EX_TABLE(_fault, _target) \
|
||||
stringify_in_c(.section __ex_table,"a";)\
|
||||
PPC_LONG_ALIGN stringify_in_c(;) \
|
||||
PPC_LONG stringify_in_c(_fault;) \
|
||||
PPC_LONG stringify_in_c(_target;) \
|
||||
stringify_in_c(.balign 4;) \
|
||||
stringify_in_c(.long (_fault) - . ;) \
|
||||
stringify_in_c(.long (_target) - . ;) \
|
||||
stringify_in_c(.previous)
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_PPC_ASM_H */
|
||||
|
@@ -64,23 +64,30 @@
|
||||
__access_ok((__force unsigned long)(addr), (size), get_fs()))
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The exception table consists of pairs of addresses: the first is the
|
||||
* address of an instruction that is allowed to fault, and the second is
|
||||
* The exception table consists of pairs of relative addresses: the first is
|
||||
* the address of an instruction that is allowed to fault, and the second is
|
||||
* the address at which the program should continue. No registers are
|
||||
* modified, so it is entirely up to the continuation code to figure out
|
||||
* what to do.
|
||||
* modified, so it is entirely up to the continuation code to figure out what
|
||||
* to do.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* All the routines below use bits of fixup code that are out of line
|
||||
* with the main instruction path. This means when everything is well,
|
||||
* we don't even have to jump over them. Further, they do not intrude
|
||||
* on our cache or tlb entries.
|
||||
* All the routines below use bits of fixup code that are out of line with the
|
||||
* main instruction path. This means when everything is well, we don't even
|
||||
* have to jump over them. Further, they do not intrude on our cache or tlb
|
||||
* entries.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#define ARCH_HAS_RELATIVE_EXTABLE
|
||||
|
||||
struct exception_table_entry {
|
||||
unsigned long insn;
|
||||
unsigned long fixup;
|
||||
int insn;
|
||||
int fixup;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static inline unsigned long extable_fixup(const struct exception_table_entry *x)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (unsigned long)&x->fixup + x->fixup;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* These are the main single-value transfer routines. They automatically
|
||||
* use the right size if we just have the right pointer type.
|
||||
|
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
|
||||
* zero, try to fix up.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((entry = search_exception_tables(regs->nip)) != NULL) {
|
||||
regs->nip = entry->fixup;
|
||||
regs->nip = extable_fixup(entry);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static inline int check_io_access(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
(*nip & 0x100)? "OUT to": "IN from",
|
||||
regs->gpr[rb] - _IO_BASE, nip);
|
||||
regs->msr |= MSR_RI;
|
||||
regs->nip = entry->fixup;
|
||||
regs->nip = extable_fixup(entry);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ void bad_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address, int sig)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Are we prepared to handle this fault? */
|
||||
if ((entry = search_exception_tables(regs->nip)) != NULL) {
|
||||
regs->nip = entry->fixup;
|
||||
regs->nip = extable_fixup(entry);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static int ppc750_machine_check_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
if ((entry = search_exception_tables(regs->nip)) != NULL) {
|
||||
tsi108_clear_pci_cfg_error();
|
||||
regs->msr |= MSR_RI;
|
||||
regs->nip = entry->fixup;
|
||||
regs->nip = extable_fixup(entry);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int mpc7448_machine_check_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
if ((entry = search_exception_tables(regs->nip)) != NULL) {
|
||||
tsi108_clear_pci_cfg_error();
|
||||
regs->msr |= MSR_RI;
|
||||
regs->nip = entry->fixup;
|
||||
regs->nip = extable_fixup(entry);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ int fsl_rio_mcheck_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
out_be32((u32 *)(rio_regs_win + RIO_LTLEDCSR),
|
||||
0);
|
||||
regs->msr |= MSR_RI;
|
||||
regs->nip = entry->fixup;
|
||||
regs->nip = extable_fixup(entry);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user