xiaomi-sm8450/android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8450
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists

Browse Source 
We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode.
Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Layton
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
committed by Jeff Layton
parent a7231a9746
commit 6109c85037
9 changed files with 71 additions and 69 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
View File

@@ -1376,12 +1376,12 @@ static int nfs4_reclaim_locks(struct nfs4_state *state, const struct nfs4_state_
/* Guard against delegation returns and new lock/unlock calls */
down_write(&nfsi->rwsem);
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
spin_lock(&flctx->flc_lock);
restart:
list_for_each_entry(fl, list, fl_list) {
if (nfs_file_open_context(fl->fl_file)->state != state)
continue;
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
spin_unlock(&flctx->flc_lock);
status = ops->recover_lock(state, fl);
switch (status) {
case 0:
@@ -1408,13 +1408,13 @@ restart:
/* kill_proc(fl->fl_pid, SIGLOST, 1); */
status = 0;
}
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
spin_lock(&flctx->flc_lock);
}
if (list == &flctx->flc_posix) {
list = &flctx->flc_flock;
goto restart;
}
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
spin_unlock(&flctx->flc_lock);
out:
up_write(&nfsi->rwsem);
return status;