locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists
We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ nlm_traverse_locks(struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_file *file,
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
again:
|
||||
file->f_locks = 0;
|
||||
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock(&flctx->flc_lock);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(fl, &flctx->flc_posix, fl_list) {
|
||||
if (fl->fl_lmops != &nlmsvc_lock_operations)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ again:
|
||||
if (match(lockhost, host)) {
|
||||
struct file_lock lock = *fl;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&flctx->flc_lock);
|
||||
lock.fl_type = F_UNLCK;
|
||||
lock.fl_start = 0;
|
||||
lock.fl_end = OFFSET_MAX;
|
||||
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ again:
|
||||
goto again;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&flctx->flc_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -232,14 +232,14 @@ nlm_file_inuse(struct nlm_file *file)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (flctx && !list_empty_careful(&flctx->flc_posix)) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock(&flctx->flc_lock);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(fl, &flctx->flc_posix, fl_list) {
|
||||
if (fl->fl_lmops == &nlmsvc_lock_operations) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&flctx->flc_lock);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&flctx->flc_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
file->f_locks = 0;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user