sched: Allow put_prev_task() to drop rq->lock

Currently the pick_next_task() loop is convoluted and ugly because of
how it can drop the rq->lock and needs to restart the picking.

For the RT/Deadline classes, it is put_prev_task() where we do
balancing, and we could do this before the picking loop. Make this
possible.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@digitalocean.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/e4519f6850477ab7f3d257062796e6425ee4ba7c.1559129225.git.vpillai@digitalocean.com
This commit is contained in:
Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 20:36:43 +00:00
parent 5ba553eff0
commit 5f2a45fc9e
7 changed files with 32 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@@ -1710,7 +1710,7 @@ struct sched_class {
struct task_struct * (*pick_next_task)(struct rq *rq,
struct task_struct *prev,
struct rq_flags *rf);
void (*put_prev_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
void (*put_prev_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf);
void (*set_next_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -1756,7 +1756,7 @@ struct sched_class {
static inline void put_prev_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->curr != prev);
prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev, NULL);
}
static inline void set_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)