xiaomi-sm8450/android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8450
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

perf tools: Fix modifier to be applied on correct events

Browse Source 
The event modifier needs to be applied only on the event definition it
is attached to.

The current state is that in case of multiple events definition (in
single '-e' option, separated by ',') all will get modifier of the last
one.

Fixing this by adding separated list for each event definition, so the
modifier is applied only to proper event(s). Added automated test to
catch this, plus some other modifier tests.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1332267341-26338-3-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jiri Olsa
2012-03-20 19:15:40 +01:00
committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
parent 9fafd98f1b
commit 5d7be90ed5
6 changed files with 544 additions and 338 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

27
tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
View File

@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ struct event_symbol {
const char *alias;
};
int parse_events_parse(struct list_head *list, int *idx);
int parse_events_parse(struct list_head *list, struct list_head *list_tmp,
int *idx);
#define CHW(x) .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_##x
#define CSW(x) .type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_SW_##x
@@ -671,6 +672,18 @@ int parse_events_add_pmu(struct list_head *list, int *idx,
return add_event(list, idx, &attr, (char *) "pmu");
}
void parse_events_update_lists(struct list_head *list_event,
struct list_head *list_all)
{
/*
* Called for single event definition. Update the
* 'all event' list, and reinit the 'signle event'
* list, for next event definition.
*/
list_splice_tail(list_event, list_all);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(list_event);
}
int parse_events_modifier(struct list_head *list, char *str)
{
struct perf_evsel *evsel;
@@ -736,14 +749,14 @@ int parse_events_modifier(struct list_head *list, char *str)
int parse_events(struct perf_evlist *evlist, const char *str, int unset __used)
{
struct perf_evsel *evsel, *h;
LIST_HEAD(list);
LIST_HEAD(list_tmp);
YY_BUFFER_STATE buffer;
int ret, idx = evlist->nr_entries;
buffer = parse_events__scan_string(str);
ret = parse_events_parse(&list, &idx);
ret = parse_events_parse(&list, &list_tmp, &idx);
parse_events__flush_buffer(buffer);
parse_events__delete_buffer(buffer);
@@ -754,9 +767,11 @@ int parse_events(struct perf_evlist *evlist, const char *str, int unset __used)
return 0;
}
list_for_each_entry_safe(evsel, h, &list, node)
perf_evsel__delete(evsel);
/*
* There are 2 users - builtin-record and builtin-test objects.
* Both call perf_evlist__delete in case of error, so we dont
* need to bother.
*/
fprintf(stderr, "invalid or unsupported event: '%s'\n", str);
fprintf(stderr, "Run 'perf list' for a list of valid events\n");
return ret;