drm/i915: Don't apply the 16Gb DIMM wm latency w/a to BXT/GLK

The 16Gb DIMM w/a is not applicable to BXT or GLK. Limit it to
the appropriate platforms.

This was especially harsh on GLK since we don't even try to read
the DIMM information on that platforms, hence valid_dimm was
always false and thus we always tried to apply the w/a.
Furthermore the w/a pushed the level 0 latency above the
level 1 latency, which doesn't really make sense.

v2: Do the check when populating is_16gb_dimm (Mahesh)

Cc: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 86b592876c ("drm/i915: Implement 16GB dimm wa for latency level-0")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181023182102.31549-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.sh.kumar@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-23 21:21:02 +03:00
parent 26ee5bc390
commit 5d6f36b27d
3 changed files with 9 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@@ -2881,8 +2881,7 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
* any underrun. If not able to get Dimm info assume 16GB dimm
* to avoid any underrun.
*/
if (!dev_priv->dram_info.valid_dimm ||
dev_priv->dram_info.is_16gb_dimm)
if (dev_priv->dram_info.is_16gb_dimm)
wm[0] += 1;
} else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {