fsnotify: remove redundant arguments to handle_event()

inode_mark and vfsmount_mark arguments are passed to handle_event()
operation as function arguments as well as on iter_info struct.
The difference is that iter_info struct may contain marks that should
not be handled and are represented as NULL arguments to inode_mark or
vfsmount_mark.

Instead of passing the inode_mark and vfsmount_mark arguments, add
a report_mask member to iter_info struct to indicate which marks should
be handled, versus marks that should only be kept alive during user
wait.

This change is going to be used for passing more mark types
with handle_event() (i.e. super block marks).

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c

@@ -79,12 +79,11 @@ static void dnotify_recalc_inode_mask(struct fsnotify_mark *fsn_mark)
  */
 static int dnotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 				struct inode *inode,
-				struct fsnotify_mark *inode_mark,
-				struct fsnotify_mark *vfsmount_mark,
 				u32 mask, const void *data, int data_type,
 				const unsigned char *file_name, u32 cookie,
 				struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info)
 {
+	struct fsnotify_mark *inode_mark = fsnotify_iter_inode_mark(iter_info);
 	struct dnotify_mark *dn_mark;
 	struct dnotify_struct *dn;
 	struct dnotify_struct **prev;
@@ -95,7 +94,8 @@ static int dnotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 	if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
 		return 0;
 
-	BUG_ON(vfsmount_mark);
+	if (WARN_ON(fsnotify_iter_vfsmount_mark(iter_info)))
+		return 0;
 
 	dn_mark = container_of(inode_mark, struct dnotify_mark, fsn_mark);