wrappers for ->i_mutex access
parallel to mutex_{lock,unlock,trylock,is_locked,lock_nested}, inode_foo(inode) being mutex_foo(&inode->i_mutex). Please, use those for access to ->i_mutex; over the coming cycle ->i_mutex will become rwsem, with ->lookup() done with it held only shared. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static loff_t hpfs_dir_lseek(struct file *filp, loff_t off, int whence)
|
||||
if (whence == SEEK_DATA || whence == SEEK_HOLE)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&i->i_mutex);
|
||||
inode_lock(i);
|
||||
hpfs_lock(s);
|
||||
|
||||
/*pr_info("dir lseek\n");*/
|
||||
@@ -48,12 +48,12 @@ static loff_t hpfs_dir_lseek(struct file *filp, loff_t off, int whence)
|
||||
ok:
|
||||
filp->f_pos = new_off;
|
||||
hpfs_unlock(s);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&i->i_mutex);
|
||||
inode_unlock(i);
|
||||
return new_off;
|
||||
fail:
|
||||
/*pr_warn("illegal lseek: %016llx\n", new_off);*/
|
||||
hpfs_unlock(s);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&i->i_mutex);
|
||||
inode_unlock(i);
|
||||
return -ESPIPE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user