x86/asm/entry: Remove user_mode_ignore_vm86()
user_mode_ignore_vm86() can be used instead of user_mode(), in places where we have already done a v8086_mode() security check of ptregs. But doing this check in the wrong place would be a bug that could result in security problems, and also the naming still isn't very clear. Furthermore, it only affects 32-bit kernels, while most development happens on 64-bit kernels. If we replace them with user_mode() checks then the cost is only a very minor increase in various slowpaths: text data bss dec hex filename 10573391 703562 1753042 13029995 c6d26b vmlinux.o.before 10573423 703562 1753042 13030027 c6d28b vmlinux.o.after So lets get rid of this distinction once and for all. Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150329090233.GA1963@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2159,7 +2159,7 @@ static unsigned long code_segment_base(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
if (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK)
|
||||
return 0x10 * regs->cs;
|
||||
|
||||
if (user_mode_ignore_vm86(regs) && regs->cs != __USER_CS)
|
||||
if (user_mode(regs) && regs->cs != __USER_CS)
|
||||
return get_segment_base(regs->cs);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
if (user_mode(regs) && !user_64bit_mode(regs) &&
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user