hfs: prevent btree data loss on ENOSPC
Inserting a new record in a btree may require splitting several of its nodes. If we hit ENOSPC halfway through, the new nodes will be left orphaned and their records will be lost. This could mean lost inodes or extents. Henceforth, check the available disk space before making any changes. This still leaves the potential problem of corruption on ENOMEM. There is no need to reserve space before deleting a catalog record, as we do for hfsplus. This difference is because hfs index nodes have fixed length keys. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ab5fc8a7d5ffccfd5f27b1cf2cb4ceb6c110da74.1536269131.git.ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ernesto A. Fernández <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Linus Torvalds

parent
d92915c35b
commit
54640c7502
@@ -117,6 +117,10 @@ static int __hfs_ext_write_extent(struct inode *inode, struct hfs_find_data *fd)
|
||||
if (HFS_I(inode)->flags & HFS_FLG_EXT_NEW) {
|
||||
if (res != -ENOENT)
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
/* Fail early and avoid ENOSPC during the btree operation */
|
||||
res = hfs_bmap_reserve(fd->tree, fd->tree->depth + 1);
|
||||
if (res)
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
hfs_brec_insert(fd, HFS_I(inode)->cached_extents, sizeof(hfs_extent_rec));
|
||||
HFS_I(inode)->flags &= ~(HFS_FLG_EXT_DIRTY|HFS_FLG_EXT_NEW);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user